Current:Home > ContactWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections -GrowthInsight
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View
Date:2025-04-17 09:18:55
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (98331)
Related
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- You'll Love Ariana Grande Harder for Trolling Her Own Makeup Look
- The Idol Makeup Artist Kirsten Coleman Reveals Euphoria Easter Eggs in the New Series
- A Siege of 80 Large, Uncontained Wildfires Sweeps the Hot, Dry West
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Calif. Earmarks a Quarter of Its Cap-and-Trade Riches for Environmental Justice
- Bling Empire Stars Pay Tribute to “Mesmerizing” Anna Shay Following Her Death
- Tibetan Nomads Struggle as Grasslands Disappear from the Roof of the World
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Bindi Irwin Honors Parents Steve and Terri's Eternal Love in Heartfelt Anniversary Message
Ranking
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- The Idol Costume Designer Natasha Newman-Thomas Details the Dark, Twisted Fantasy of the Fashion
- 84 of the Most Popular Father’s Day Gift Ideas for Every Type of Dad
- Adding Batteries to Existing Rooftop Solar Could Qualify for 30 Percent Tax Credit
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- A Siege of 80 Large, Uncontained Wildfires Sweeps the Hot, Dry West
- Ex-cardinal Theodore McCarrick, now 92, not competent to stand trial in sex abuse case, expert says
- Trump EPA Proposes Weaker Coal Ash Rules, More Use at Construction Sites
Recommendation
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Big Banks Make a Dangerous Bet on the World’s Growing Demand for Food
‘We Need to Be Bold,’ Biden Says, Taking the First Steps in a Major Shift in Climate Policy
Naomi Campbell welcomes second child at age 53
A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
Princess Eugenie Gives Birth, Welcomes Baby No. 2 With Husband Jack Brooksbank
Experts Divided Over Safety of Indian Point Nuclear Power Plant
In Exxon Climate Fraud Case, Judge Rejects Defense Tactic that Attacked the Prosecutor